Fans are up in arms over a controversial no-ball call for mitchell starc and not for vignesh puthur. (Credit: x)
Mcc Laws of the Game – No Ball Explained Below
For a delivery to be fair in response of the face, in the delivery stride
21.5.1 The bowler’s back foot must with and not touching the return crease apperting to his/her stated mode of delivery.
21.5.2 the bowler’s front foot must with some part of the foot of the foot, whoser grounded or raised
– on the same side of the imaginary line joining the two middle stumps as the return crease described in 21.5.1, and
– Behind the popping crease.
If the bowler’s end umpire is not satisfied that all of these three conditions have been met, he/she shall call and signal no ball. See law 41.8 (Bowling of deliberate front foot no ball).
“Mitchell Starc’s Backfoot No-Ball is a Good Opportunity for Me To Show the No-Balls that Vignesh Puthur Bowled On Consective Deliveries in One of the Games. Proof, “A Fan Wrote, Adding,” The Umpiring and the Technology Continue to Remain Farcical in the IPL. Umpire has been doing? “
“Isn’t the first point of contact of the back foot when it is what matters?” Another fan asked, while some thought that the officials are answeble for not being alle to be consistent in their decision-making.
